Grass management (methane emissions)

Last update: 2 June 2023

  • Action: Reduction of enteric methane emission.
  • Animal category: All ruminants.
  • Technique: Improve quality and digestibility of grass via decreasing grass maturity through better grazing management and early cutting of grass for conservation as silage or hay.
  • Mode of action: Decreasing grass maturity results in greater digestible energy and protein content.
  • Potential efficacy: 13% abatement of enteric CH4 emissions per kg milk on average.
  • Nature of evidence of efficacy: Peer-reviewed scientific publications (meta-analysis).
  • Factors impacting on efficacy: Plant species; variety; maturity at harvest and preservation can affect forage quality and digestibility.
  • Mode of use: Grazing or conservation as hay or silage.
  • Requirements/limitations: Applicable in all grass-based production systems; requires good knowledge of local agronomic conditions and careful management by farmers.
  • Economic consequences: Reduction of grass yield compensated partially by higher forage efficiency and increased milk yield.
  • Other considerations: The higher protein content in grass may increase nitrogen excretion; this can be mitigated by combining with low protein concentrate to optimize overall nitrogen content in the diet; possible synergies with legume grass and tanniferous forages.
  • References:
  • Other techniques: Unsaturated fat sources (linseed, rapeseed fat); electron sink (nitrate); methane inhibitors (Asparagopsis taxiformis, 3-NOP, tanniferous forages); shift in rumen fermentation pattern (tannins, probiotics, organic acids, essential oils, decreasing forage-to-concentrate ratio); lower emission intensity (increasing feeding level, increasing feed efficiency, decreasing grass maturity).
Back >

Download PDF >
Type of challenge
Environment
Challenge(s)
Climate change (enteric methane emissions)
FEFAC Sustainability Charter 2030 Ambitions
2
Foster Sustainable Food Systems Through Increased Resource & Nutrient Efficiency
5
Enhance the Socio-Economic Environment and the Livestock & Aquaculture Sectors’ Resilience