Dietary fibre (tail biting)

Last update: 2 June 2023

  • Action: Reduce the risk of tail biting, thus avoiding the need for tail docking.
  • Animal category: Fattening pigs and gilts.
  • Technique: Inclusion of 12 to 14% of high-fiber feed ingredients such as oat hulls, beet pulp, chicory, soy hulls or sunflower seed meal.
  • Mode of action: Dietary fiber impacts gut health and tail biting predisposition by providing physical structure to the digesta, increasing the feelings of satiety resulting in less manipulative behavior directed at pen mates, less oral behavior reducing aggressivity.
  • Potential efficacy: Reduction of the number of animals with tail damage observed but not quantifiable as tail biting is a multifactorial challenge, which satiety is only one.
  • Nature of evidence of efficacy: Peer-reviewed scientific publications.
  • Factors impacting on efficacy: Enrichment of the pen, climate, hygiene, growth stage, genetic potential and health status of the animals; amino acid and mineral composition of the feed; no evidence of efficacy on weaned piglets.
  • Mode of use: Formulation of the standard complete feed.
  • Requirements/limitations: No limitation.
  • Economic consequences: Reduction of feed intake and daily gain but no impact on feed conversion ratio; higher meat percentage; no impact on offsprings.
  • Other considerations: Use of dietary fiber has positive effects on gut health (a.o. reduction of the risk of gastric ulcers) and reduces boar taint for entire males.
  • References:
  • Other techniques: Balancing diet with amino acids and minerals.
Back >

Download PDF >
Type of challenge
Animal Welfare
Challenge(s)
Avoiding tail docking of pigs
FEFAC Sustainability Charter 2030 Ambitions
4
Contribute to Improving Farm Animal Health & Welfare
5
Enhance the Socio-Economic Environment and the Livestock & Aquaculture Sectors’ Resilience